Street-Side Parking vs Garage Parking
| Feature | Street-Side Parking | Garage Parking |
|---|---|---|
| Accessibility | High, directly adjacent to destinations | Moderate, requires entry into a dedicated facility |
| Cost of Implementation | Low, uses existing road infrastructure | High, construction and maintenance of a building |
| Operational Cost | Low, minimal maintenance required | High, ongoing operational and maintenance costs |
| Convenience | High, quick and easy access | Moderate, involves locating, entering, and exiting the garage |
| Security | Low, exposed to the public and potential vandalism | High, controlled access and surveillance |
| Capacity | Limited, dependent on available curb space | High, multiple levels provide increased capacity |
| Weather Protection | Low, vehicles are exposed to the elements | High, sheltered environment |
| Space Utilization | Low, inefficient use of urban space | High, vertical stacking optimizes space usage |
| Environmental Impact | Moderate, urban heat island effect | High, potential for higher energy consumption |
| Revenue Generation | Moderate, metered parking can generate income | High, fees for long-term and short-term parking |
| Availability | Low, often limited in busy urban areas | High, dedicated spaces available |
| Navigation | Difficult, searching for available spots can be challenging | Moderate, clear signage and designated spots |
| Safety | Low, higher risk of accidents due to traffic proximity | High, reduced interaction with street traffic |
| Aesthetics | Low, cluttered streetscapes | High, organized and structured appearance |
| Pollution | High, idling cars contribute to emissions | Moderate, reduced idling with designated spots |
| Time Efficiency | Low, time spent searching for spots | High, designated spaces reduce search time |
| Regulatory Control | High, subject to local parking regulations | Moderate, facility rules and regulations apply |
| User Experience | Low, exposure to weather and traffic | High, sheltered and secure environment |
| Maintenance Requirements | Low, basic road maintenance | High, building maintenance and upkeep |
| Flexibility | High, easily adjusted with signage and markings | Low, fixed structure limits adaptability |
| Emergency Accessibility | Moderate, easy access for emergency vehicles | High, controlled environment for emergencies |
| Technology Integration | Low, basic metering systems | High, potential for advanced payment and monitoring systems |
| Long-Term Viability | Low, dependent on urban planning and development | High, sustainable with proper maintenance |
| Scalability | Low, limited by street length and urban planning | High, can be expanded vertically |
| Impact on Pedestrians | High, reduces sidewalk space | Low, designated facilities separate vehicles and pedestrians |
| Traffic Flow | Low, can disrupt traffic with parking maneuvers | High, minimizes on-street parking interruptions |
| Availability of Services | Low, limited to nearby amenities | High, potential for integrated services (e.g., car wash) |
| Environmental Sustainability | Low, increased emissions and heat | High, potential for green building practices |
| Investment Return | Moderate, consistent revenue from metered spaces | High, profitable with high turnover and long-term contracts |
| User Demographics | Broad, accessible to all drivers | Targeted, often used by commuters and long-term parkers |
| Management Complexity | Low, simple enforcement and management | High, requires dedicated management and staffing |
| Impact on Property Values | Moderate, can increase convenience for nearby properties | High, adds value and attracts businesses |
Street-side parking offers high accessibility and low implementation costs but lacks security and capacity, while garage parking provides enhanced security, weather protection, and efficient space utilization at a higher cost.